For a brief period of time in 2013, it segregated its members at different tables based upon their winrates, but this system was ended because some people were able to circumvent it. Party Poker itself has taken a few tentative steps in the past to shelter amateurs from the depredations of experienced cardsharks. No Screennames Are Shown - Players Are Identified Only by a Number Other operators have also implemented certain features to help non-pro customers, like Unibet allowing users to change their screennames up to three times a day and iPoker’s switching to Real Player Value calculations, which deliver more rewards to net depositing (read: losing) customers and less to net withdrawers. This keeps cash flowing through the games with the house levying its cut on every tournament entry and cash game hand.īodog/ Bovada was a trend-setter in this space with the introduction of its recreational player model, including anonymous games, back in 2011. It is therefore to the advantage of the poker sites to restrict professionals’ ability to hunt down whales while simultaneously giving these unskilled players incentives to keep spending their time (and money) at the tables. The reasoning behind these efforts is that winners remove a lot of money from the poker economy when they withdraw their profits however, losing players don’t generate any long-term earnings from the game, instead converting most of their deposits to rake, which benefits the operator. Attempts to cater to recreational customers rather than winning regs have become common within the online poker industry during the past decade.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |